Low-value clinical practices in injury care: A scoping review and expert consultation survey.

TitleLow-value clinical practices in injury care: A scoping review and expert consultation survey.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2019
AuteursMoore, L, Lauzier, F, Tardif, P-A, Boukar, KMalloum, Farhat, I, Archambault, P, Mercier, É, Lamontagne, F, Chassé, M, Stelfox, HT, Berthelot, S, Gabbe, B, Lecky, F, Yanchar, N, Champion, H, Kortbeek, J, Cameron, P, Bonaventure, PLessard, Paquet, J, Truchon, C, Turgeon, AF
Corporate AuthorsCanadian Traumatic brain injury Research Consortium
JournalJ Trauma Acute Care Surg
Volume86
Issue6
Pagination983-993
Date Published2019 Jun
ISSN2163-0763
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tests and treatments that are not supported by evidence and could expose patients to unnecessary harm, referred to here as low-value clinical practices, consume up to 30% of health care resources. Choosing Wisely and other organizations have published lists of clinical practices to be avoided. However, few apply to injury and most are based uniquely on expert consensus. We aimed to identify low-value clinical practices in acute injury care.METHODS: We conducted a scoping review targeting articles, reviews and guidelines that identified low-value clinical practices specific to injury populations. Thirty-six experts rated clinical practices on a five-point Likert scale from clearly low value to clearly beneficial. Clinical practices reported as low value by at least one level I, II, or III study and considered clearly or potentially low-value by at least 75% of experts were retained as candidates for low-value injury care.RESULTS: Of 50,695 citations, 815 studies were included and led to the identification of 150 clinical practices. Of these, 63 were considered candidates for low-value injury care; 33 in the emergency room, 9 in trauma surgery, 15 in the intensive care unit, and 5 in orthopedics. We also identified 87 "gray zone" practices, which did not meet our criteria for low-value care.CONCLUSION: We identified 63 low-value clinical practices in acute injury care that are supported by empirical evidence and expert opinion. Conditional on future research, they represent potential targets for guidelines, overuse metrics and de-implementation interventions. We also identified 87 "gray zone" practices, which may be interesting targets for value-based decision-making. Our study represents an important step toward the deimplementation of low-value clinical practices in injury care.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review, Level IV.

DOI10.1097/TA.0000000000002246
Alternate JournalJ Trauma Acute Care Surg
PubMed ID31124896